Evidence, Impact, and Strategic Implications (2025 Edition)
This 2025 edition compiles major policy changes and funding shifts impacting NGOs and nonprofits under the Donald Trump administration. The evidence below—drawn from leading policy outlets, nonprofit organizations, and investigative media—shows a significant reduction or freeze in federal funding to U.S.-based and foreign NGOs, as well as heightened regulatory uncertainty. Collectively, these actions represent a structural redefinition of the U.S. government’s financial relationship with civil society.
Source: National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC)
Read full article
The NCRC reports that an order from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) directed agencies to halt disbursement of a wide range of federal financial assistance programs, including grants to nonprofits and NGOs. The freeze, framed as a review of funding for programs tied to “woke ideology” and “foreign aid,” left thousands of community-based nonprofits without critical operating support. Legal experts questioned whether the executive authority used was constitutional, given Congress’s budgetary powers.
Source: The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Read full article
This coverage details widespread concern among nonprofit leaders that Trump-era policy shifts—particularly reduced federal contracts and eliminated programmatic grants—undermined organizational stability. Surveys cited reveal that nearly 70% of nonprofit executives reported harm to their missions, while only 4% saw any benefit from administration policy.
Source: Arnold & Porter LLP (Legal Analysis)
Read full article
This policy analysis outlines an executive order directing all federal agencies to reassess grants to NGOs that “undermine U.S. national interests.” Legal experts interpret this as a sweeping ideological filter that could exclude NGOs involved in human rights, environmental, and foreign democracy programs from eligibility for federal funding.
Source: International Bar Association
Read full article
The IBA article describes staff cuts and restructuring within USAID that effectively paused thousands of international aid programs. As many foreign NGOs rely heavily on USAID funding, these freezes had ripple effects globally—reducing humanitarian aid, public health, and legal-reform initiatives across dozens of countries.
Source: Devex
Read full article
Devex reports that the administration’s proposed FY2026 budget includes sweeping cuts to humanitarian and development programs—reducing PEPFAR by $1.8B and eliminating support for Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. The total proposed reduction exceeds $30 billion, effectively dismantling major global health and poverty-relief partnerships.
Source: Vera Institute of Justice
Read full article
Vera Institute analysts argue that the administration’s DOJ-led review of justice grants resulted in over $800 million in canceled programs—including funds supporting local police reform, violence prevention, and reentry programs. The article warns that the defunding of nonprofits working in community safety will have lasting social costs.
Source: Urban Institute
Read full article
The Urban Institute highlights that 35,000 U.S. nonprofits rely on government grants for over half their operating revenue. Following executive orders to suspend or review funding, thousands faced layoffs and program terminations. Economists warn of a “funding cliff” affecting the most vulnerable communities.
Source: Hedgeman Law Firm
Read full article
This legal commentary describes how executive and administrative actions increased audit risks, introduced delays in disbursements, and generated uncertainty about contract renewals. Nonprofits, especially in healthcare and housing, were disproportionately affected by prolonged grant reviews.
Source: Imprint News
Read full article
National CASA, which supports 900+ child-advocacy programs nationwide, lost millions in federal grants during the administration’s budget realignment. This example illustrates how program-specific cuts ripple into community-level service interruptions, particularly in child welfare and foster care systems.
Source: Verfassungsblog
Read full article
This legal-political essay examines how the administration’s rhetoric and actions—threatening to revoke tax-exempt status of nonprofits involved in advocacy—combine financial pressure with ideological control. The result, according to the analysis, is a chilling effect on civil-society activism and dissent.
Source: The Chronicle of Philanthropy
Read full article
This report shows that nearly one-third of U.S. nonprofits that provide essential community services lost, delayed, or had their government funding frozen during the first half of 2025. According to data presented, 21% lost a grant or contract outright, 27% experienced delays or freezes, and 6% were hit with stop-work orders. The article concludes that local communities bore the brunt of these funding disruptions, with many small nonprofits unable to maintain staff or services.
1. Diversify Revenue Streams: NGOs must reduce reliance on federal funding and increase partnerships with private, corporate, or philanthropic entities.
2. Strengthen Compliance Capacity: Enhanced reporting, grant management, and digital skills (especially in Microsoft Excel and PowerPoint) can help organizations adapt to shifting requirements.
3. Build Local and Municipal Alliances: Collaborate with cities, counties, and states that have more stable funding pools and are less subject to federal volatility.
4. Advocate for Transparency: Engage in policy advocacy to demand publication of criteria used for grant suspension or ideological screening.
5. Invest in Technology and Training: Resilience in the nonprofit sector now depends on digital readiness. Training staff to operate efficiently and independently of federal systems can safeguard continuity.